Explain Please

[oceaneagle 0]

Does this mean that attacking players do not get an EK in the opposite town but defending players do.

 

Or is it no one gets an EK in town during a Crusade.

 

 

 

 

[Synz 0]

Does this mean that attacking players do not get an EK in the opposite town but defending players do.

 

Or is it no one gets an EK in town during a Crusade.

Attacking players do not get eks in enemy town, however the defending town killing an attacking player IS an ek.

 

That's how it's supposed to work anyways.

[Magazo 0]

i think its like this:

u can get ek in ur own city (kill ppl trying to destroy shields)

u cant get ek in enemy city (so u only have to dstroy shield)

how to get ek ---> defend shields or play at bases in ml

[Shompy 0]

and what about huntzones like EF, SW, DV, RH, and gardens?

[~farjat 0]

Does this mean that attacking players do not get an EK in the opposite town but defending players do.

 

 

exactly this.

Atacker only no EK.

 

And this only apply to towns. (aresden/elvine maps)

[oceaneagle 0]

Does this mean that attacking players do not get an EK in the opposite town but defending players do.

 

 

exactly this.

Atacker only no EK.

 

And this only apply to towns. (aresden/elvine maps)

 

 

Thank you !

[Guest WetWendy]

I think when u kill an enemy, no matter what map.. it should be an ek... :blink:. EK = enemy kill :blink: :(

[~Hunter[GM] 0]

We needed to alleviate the problem of mass players camping the town shops all sade long and not participating in the intended purpose of a sade.

 

sades are won and lost in the middlelands....not boxing the WH or shop.

 

And this has been a success

There are far less players camping and more are out constructing and defending the bases, searching for EKs in middlelands.

 

I think it was a great idea and has worked well.