MeRcY-Rast

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    840

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MeRcY-Rast

  3. Posted · Report reply

    could have been added to first post. not many people read all the comments.

     

    will need to check all players (ares+elv) for borrowed items. clearly some not as obvious as sb, but will need checking also for their items, to be fair ruling.

     

    all who borrowed shared any items need to be disqualified.

    Its not that you cant borrow items from your guild to fight in guild vs guild event. Its the fact that 2 teams shared the same items in 2 different fights. If a guild is large and strong enough to have 2 teams then it should be equipped enough to not have to use the same items from another team.

     

     

    LIke we did, we leave all itens like pa,mp/ and some hps for TEam Mage use it... like capes etc... I know this does not justify anything but all read the rules and respect it from inner...

  4. Posted · Report reply

    white why cant use AMP ? ESW rox in this event if u have only PFMEd no chance in Arena mode... big Dmg + Strip + SP --- !

     

    i vote for AMP +1 !

    i honestly would worry more about the 5 sb team , they with their mr/ma 91239129391239 sets would rape the mages and be hard for wars

    esw is great , but if u cast twice then need to regen hp then it wont be that gud =/

    a

     

     

    trueee... but where i hear, my guild is coming with 2 esw + 1 helfire...

    lol... thats goonna be insane.

     

     

    ohhhhh Crapp... hehehe

  5. Posted · Report reply

    white why cant use AMP ? ESW rox in this event if u have only PFMEd no chance in Arena mode... big Dmg + Strip + SP --- !

     

    i vote for AMP +1 !

    i honestly would worry more about the 5 sb team , they with their mr/ma 91239129391239 sets would rape the mages and be hard for wars

    esw is great , but if u cast twice then need to regen hp then it wont be that gud =/

    a

     

     

    trueee... but where i hear, my guild is coming with 2 esw + 1 helfire...

    lol... thats goonna be insane.

  8. Posted · Edited by MeRcY-Rast · Report reply

    About 69.

    Disparando 69.93.64.178 com 32 bytes de dados:

    Resposta de 69.93.64.178: bytes=32 tempo=264ms TTL=116

    Resposta de 69.93.64.178: bytes=32 tempo=197ms TTL=116

    Resposta de 69.93.64.178: bytes=32 tempo=191ms TTL=116

    Resposta de 69.93.64.178: bytes=32 tempo=187ms TTL=116

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rastreando a rota para engsw.biz [69.93.64.178]

    com no máximo 30 saltos:

     

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms lua.sicoobcascavel.com.br [10.28.17.253]

    2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 201.35.29.33

    3 181 ms 214 ms 508 ms BrT-S-10-0-7-9-CSCGO301.brasiltelecom.net.br [xx

    1.xx.108.*spam*]

    4 22 ms 24 ms 24 ms BrT-G9-2-1-ctaje-core01.brasiltelecom.net.br [20

    1.10.217.65]

    5 198 ms 184 ms 189 ms BrT-10G1-0-0-spopa-border.brasiltelecom.net.br [

    201.10.241.18]

    6 282 ms 276 ms 306 ms sl-gw32-nyc-0-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.128.37

    ]

    7 232 ms 210 ms 199 ms sl-crs1-nyc-0-10-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.6.5

    3]

    8 159 ms 173 ms 153 ms te-4-2-0.edge1.NewYork1.level3.net [4.68.111.157

    ]

    9 * 391 ms 280 ms vlan90.csw4.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.69.155.254]

    10 150 ms 162 ms 162 ms ae-92-92.ebr2.NewYork1.Level3.net [4.69.148.45]

     

    11 183 ms 182 ms 180 ms ae-3-3.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.137.121]

    12 183 ms 187 ms 183 ms ae-82-82.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.151.153]

     

    13 191 ms 228 ms 187 ms ae-3-80.edge4.Dallas3.Level3.net [4.69.145.141]

     

    14 189 ms 190 ms 187 ms THE-PLANET.edge4.Dallas3.Level3.net [4.59.32.30]

     

    15 190 ms 186 ms 188 ms te7-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com [70.87.253.

    10]

    16 * * * Esgotado o tempo limite do pedido.

    17 243 ms 254 ms 345 ms po1.car03.dllstx6.networklayer.com [70.87.254.15

    4]

    18 354 ms 249 ms * engsw.biz [69.93.64.178]

    19 227 ms 213 ms 202 ms engsw.biz [69.93.64.178]

     

     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     

    about 184....

     

    Disparando 184.173.100.106 com 32 bytes de dados:

    Resposta de 184.173.100.106: bytes=32 tempo=329ms TTL=118

    Resposta de 184.173.100.106: bytes=32 tempo=306ms TTL=118

    Resposta de 184.173.100.106: bytes=32 tempo=343ms TTL=118

    Resposta de 184.173.100.106: bytes=32 tempo=312ms TTL=118

    _____________________________________________________________

     

    Rastreando a rota para 184.173.100.106-static.reverse.softlayer.com [184.173.100

    .106]

    com no máximo 30 saltos:

     

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms lua.sicoobcascavel.com.br [10.28.17.253]

    2 1 ms <1 ms 1 ms 201.35.29.33

    3 226 ms 215 ms 222 ms BrT-S-10-0-7-9-CSCGO301.brasiltelecom.net.br [xx

    1.xx.108.*spam*]

    4 138 ms 197 ms 210 ms 201.10.251.229

    5 215 ms 227 ms 125 ms BrT-G7-1-0-ctaje-border.brasiltelecom.net.br [20

    1.10.250.226]

    6 248 ms 332 ms 366 ms mai-b1-link.telia.net [213.248.92.105]

    7 245 ms 292 ms 358 ms softlayer-ic-139992-mai-b1.c.telia.net [213.248.

    78.134]

    8 283 ms 253 ms 205 ms ae7.bbr01.tm01.mia01.networklayer.com [173.192.1

    8.174]

    9 270 ms 271 ms 306 ms ae3.bbr01.sr02.hou02.networklayer.com [173.192.1

    8.162]

    10 398 ms * 347 ms ae3.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com [173.192.1

    8.218]

    11 399 ms * 337 ms ae5.dar01.sr01.dal05.networklayer.com [173.192.1

    8.215]

    12 300 ms 327 ms 294 ms po1.fcr02.sr02.dal05.networklayer.com [173.192.1

    18.139]

    13 319 ms 313 ms 305 ms 184.173.100.106-static.reverse.softlayer.com [18

    4.173.100.106]

  15. Posted · Edited by MeRcY-Rast · Report reply

    HI PT.. im still using the default settings of the game,i did not change anything, then do the same, sometimes the shit we use are better than nothing..

     

     

    so... Be happy don't worry because everything is gonna be alright, turuururrttuitutututut